Disabled Veterans Fight For Compensation Email This Story Print This Story

Disabled Veterans Fight to Protect Disability Compensation

February 20, 2008
Jere Beery, OFFE Public Relations Director

(The Veterans Advocacy Group) - They call themselves the ‘5301 Club’. All 28 members of this exclusive online group are disabled veterans whom incurred life-altering injuries or illnesses during their military service. Most of the group’s members suffer from service-connected combat related injuries, including amputee and wheelchair-bound veterans. They all receive tax-exempt disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs. They have one other thing in common; they are all fighting to protect their earned VA disability compensation from being used as a ‘divisible asset’ in a divorce.

The 5301 Club gets their name from the federal law that was created by Congress to protect disability compensation from third party awards; USC, Title 38, 5301(a)(1), Payments of benefits due or to become due under any law administered by the Secretary shall not be assignable except to the extent specifically authorized by law, and such payments made to, or on account of, a beneficiary shall be exempt from taxation, shall be exempt from the claim of creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable process whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary.

According to members of the 5301 Club, it is this federal law that is being violated by state divorce courts on a routine basis, and disabled veterans are being unjustly stripped of their earned disability compensation by state judges every day. It is very obvious by the strong and absolute wording in 5301, that Congress intended to protect veteran’s benefits and compensation from third party awards “under any legal or equitable process whatever…” And it is also very clear that this federal protection exists even “after receipt by the beneficiary”. Yet, veteran’s disability compensation continues to be misused as a divisible asset in divorce courts nationwide.

Veterans disability compensation is meant to financially assist a person disabled in the line of duty live a whole and productive life. Disability compensation is not an asset, or property. This compensation is awarded to veterans that have lost some ability to work, or maintain a daily routine. Veteran’s disability compensation is tax exempt, and uniquely awarded to a single individual based on their particular disabilities.

At some point in every divorce, both parties are required to file a sworn financial statement with the divorce court. It is at this point in the legal process that the violation of veteran’s benefits occurs. Once a veteran discloses the fact that they receive VA disability compensation and/or Social Security Disability, those amounts are ‘automatically’ calculated as joint marital financial assets and will be used by the judge to determine the veteran’s ability to pay alimony, or spousal support. Most divorce court judges wrongly treat veteran’s disability compensation exactly the same as military retirement pay. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Military retirement pay is not tax exempt, and is paid out by the Department of Defense, not the Department of Veterans Affairs.

This misinterpretation of federal law by state judges is forcing many disabled veterans going through a divorce to use their veteran’s disability compensation to pay alimony, or face contempt charges and jail if they refuse. This action is contrary to the wording and intent of the Congressional Law written to protect veteran’s benefits. Disability compensation should never be considered as an ‘asset’ in determining a disabled veteran’s net worth. According to Title 38, veteran’s benefits belong solely to the person disabled, and should never be diverted to a third party under any circumstances.

Most American taxpayers would be surprised to learn that millions of tax dollars they thought were going to pay for veteran’s benefits - were in fact being diverted to able body non-military ex-spouses in the form of alimony, or spousal support. In many of these cases, the veteran was not married to their ex-spouse when they were injured in combat. Yet, state judges continue to routinely overstep their authority and jurisdiction by ordering disabled veterans to voluntarily ‘divide’ their earned veteran’s disability compensation with their ex-spouse, or go to jail.

The judge is very aware the disabled veteran doesn’t have the funds to fight his ruling, and in most cases the veteran simply pays the court order without questioning the judge’s order. The judge is also aware that the court cannot go directly to the VA and attach to a veteran’s disability compensation; the VA won’t give it to anyone else but the disabled veteran that earned the benefit in the first place.

The 5301 Club was established in 2004 by Vietnam combat disabled veterans, Jere Beery from Ohio, and Dale Vanluven from Tennessee. Both men have impressive backgrounds as grassroots veteran’s advocates, and both men went through a divorce and both were ordered to use their service-connected disability compensation to pay alimony. Over the past 4 years, Vanluven and Beery have heard from many other disabled veterans with the very same ugly divorce situation. In turn, the 5301 Club was born and has become a ‘support group’ for these disabled veterans, and club members openly share information and ideas in an effort to assist other disabled veterans faced with the same issue.

Several of the veterans that have joined the 5301 Club have contemplated suicide in the past over this issue, and the 5301 Club has acted like a life raft for these individuals. Veteran’s disability compensation is a very sensitive and emotional issue for most combat veterans. Only the veteran knows what they went through to earn that award. For a civil court judge, that has probably never served in the military, who has no idea what you went through to earn that disability award, orders you to give your ex-wife your disability compensation, a military combat survivor suffering from PTSD can become very emotionally unstable.

The 5301 Club is comprised of an elite group of disabled veterans that wish to expose this injustice, and are willing to go public with their stories. Several of the 5301 Club members have spent time behind bars in protest of court orders which give their VA disability compensation to their ex-spouse.

Vietnam combat disabled veteran Dale Vanluven, is one of the 5301 Club veterans who were incarcerated over this issue. In 2003, Vanluven spent 180 days behind bars for refusing to use his earned disability compensation to pay spousal support. In 2004, he was sentenced to 30 more days in jail for the very same thing. In other words, combat disabled veteran, Dale Vanluven spent more time behind bars for protecting his earned veteran’s benefits, than Martha Stewart served for felony insider trading.

Vietnam combat disabled veteran, and 5301 Club member, Calvin Murphy from Michigan is another veteran jailed for refusing to give his earned veteran’s disability compensation to his ex-wife. Murphy’s case is currently in appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court. 5301 Club members David Bates from North Carolina and Phillip Bakane from Alabama have also spent time behind bars for refusing to divide their earned veteran’s disability compensation with their ex-spouses.

Although a few attorneys have agreed to represent a couple of the 5301 Club members with protecting their disability compensation, most veterans cannot find representation and attorneys turn a blind eye. The attorneys know by going after a veteran’s disability compensation in a divorce settlement, their client will win the ability to pay them.

In general, VA disability is considered a ‘cash cow’ in the legal profession and it is in the attorney’s financial best interest to win an award based on a veteran’s disability compensation. In other words, your ex-spouse and her attorney are both getting a piece of your veteran’s benefits, and the judge lets it happen. Everyone wins except the disabled veteran who earned their disability compensation award in the service of their country.

Over the past 4 years, 5301 Club members have contacted the Department of Veterans Affairs, several members of Congress and the Senate, a number of state ethics commissions and a number of federal law enforcement agencies with complaints about this blatant violation of federal law, just to be told they do not get involved in civil matters, or family court rulings.

Operation Firing For Effect is monitoring all of these cases very closely. In response to this problem, OFFE has authored a customized prenuptial agreement for future disabled veterans to consider before getting married. The OFFE document specifically states; in the unfortunate event of divorce, veteran’s disability compensation and Social Security Disability will not be considered or calculated into the divorce settlement. At this time, this appears to be the only way a veteran (man, or woman) can totally protect their disability compensation. The OFFE Prenuptial Agreement will be posted on the OFFE Web site (free of charge) soon.

Here is a list of states currently represented by 5301 Club members. Georgia, Florida, Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina, Michigan, Oklahoma, Ohio, Montana, Missouri, New Jersey, and Tennessee. Please direct all media inquires to; jerebeery@aol.com.

It is a sad state of affairs when our disabled veterans have to fight to keep their earned veterans disability benefits. OFFE will bring you any new developments on this issue.

Article Opinions

Truth wrote:

This is a lot of bull and the judges hear both sides of the issue.
I suffered abuse from my spouse for years. Cared and wiped his but back to good health to leave me for a young skinny lucid drug smoker because he wanted to have fun before he died. I earned my share of his retirement also.
03/14/08 10:02:21

Antonio Ruiz wrote:

I am happily married but i totally agree with you and i hope that the congress look into this issue more close. I live in Puerto Rico and i know a lot of veterans that are going through this situation. Good luck and God Bless you all.
03/20/08 19:21:51

Nelson Gargia Sgt. Us Army natl guard wrote:

Deployed in iraq (03-04) Cal. Army.Natl.Guard 18
months in combat zone, I returened to the country, returned to my civ. job as federal employee, 9 months later I was fired, lost my job, becaused the fire chief finds out that I was diagnosed with PTSD, by the VA hospital, I was fired during xnas season 2006, therefore I lost my house, I filed a VA claimed , conpensation, but havent recieved any, its a nite mare for me,I dont want to end up in the street, i consult a lawyer for wrongfull termanation, but coulnd find a federal lawyer to handle federal case, all my savings are gone for house payment, now facing i
foreclouse, Iam only serving the country, when I returned, all this nite mare happened, my employer have no symphaty towards war veterans I know someone have a knowledge or have a heart will hear me?omeone help me? maybe bacaused iam asian, thats why I dont count? or considered veterans? becaused of my nationality?
but I served the United States Army 8 years active duty and 15 years national guard, but seems one care?
04/20/08 20:43:23

Nelson Gargia Sgt. Us Army natl guard wrote:

Deployed in iraq (03-04) Cal. Army.Natl.Guard 18
months in combat zone, I returened to the country, returned to my civ. job as federal employee, 9 months later I was fired, lost my job, becaused the fire chief finds out that I was diagnosed with PTSD, by the VA hospital, I was fired during xnas season 2006, therefore I lost my house, I filed a VA claimed , conpensation, but havent recieved any, its a nite mare for me,I dont want to end up in the street, i consult a lawyer for wrongfull termanation, but coulnd find a federal lawyer to handle federal case, all my savings are gone for house payment, now facing i
foreclouse, Iam only serving the country, when I returned, all this nite mare happened, my employer have no symphaty towards war veterans I know someone have a knowledge or have a heart will hear me?omeone help me? maybe bacaused iam asian, thats why I dont count? or considered veterans? becaused of my nationality?
but I served the United States Army 8 years active duty and 15 years national guard, but seems one care?
04/20/08 20:50:52

william H. Heino Sr. wrote:

38 USC 1155 Notice. Judges overstepping. A veteran's observation.
How can state court judges arbitrarily award as alimony a portion of a veteran’s disability rated compensation, and waive away by reviewing the disability rights of veteran’s whose disability rating, that maybe, determined and factored in as critical? Judgment as if all disabilities are exactly the same? State court judges are overstepping those whose authority it belongs, in the practice of medicine, reevaluation, and rehabilitation of the veteran. And in doing so, the law is quite clear, along with violating the canons of standard conduct for judges, violating “Authority for schedule for rating disabilities.” 38 USC 1155, "..., in no event shall such a readjustment in the rating schedule cause a veteran's disability rating in effect on the effective date of the readjustment to be reduced unless an improvement in the veteran's disability is shown to have occurred.” Violating as well, 38 USC 5301, 42 USC 1408.
=
Thus, the Federal Circuit found that “[t]he statutory scheme … consistently excludes from judicial review all content of the ratings schedule as well as the Secretary’s actions in adopting or revising that content.” Looking at the legislative history, the Federal Circuit pointed out that “[t]he language in the legislative history is not limited to the percentages of the disability ratings, as appellants argue, but matches the statutes in broadly precluding judicial review of the contents of the disability rating schedule in toto.”
=
What needs to be done? As explained above briefly, you know your fellow veterans’ are taking a beating from judges in state divorce court. Seizing veterans’ VA disability compensation. Being awarded as alimony. These judges, although recognizing federal law, somehow justify their interpretation of 38 USC 5301 and 10 USC 1408, and the Supremacy Clause as not being perhaps strong enough. Now comes, 38 USC 1155, “Authority for schedule for rating disabilities”, this is possibly just what the disabled veteran needs to overcome the state court’s opposition and uncertainty, with a law that leaves no room for ambiguity in it’s meaning.
=
I don’t believe 1155 argument has ever been tried, or introduced in court. Once introduced, the court will have to deal and rule on this. If there are any upcoming veterans' court divorce proceedings, or even possibly pending cases, the introduction of 1155 could possibly be the one thing that will remove, hopefully forever, another burden from our disabled veterans, at an unfortunate time in their lives. I hope you found this advice worthwhile. Please post this notice on your bulletin board, email, or newsletter, there may be a veteran that can benefit from this advice Thank you.
=
William H. Heino Sr.
09/20/08 13:16:27

Archie Haase wrote:

I am tired of complaining about how combat veterans are getting screwed by this country. I am too cynical to believe anyone cares.
10/02/08 18:44:58

Add Your Opinion

:

:
:





Recent Items
» Repairing Credit After I.D. Theft
» Military Spouse Celebrities Are Coming to Town
» Suicide-Prevention ‘Webinar’
» Conference Focuses on Wellness
» DOD Launches 'Wounded Warrior Diaries'
Most Popular Items
» The New Army Combat Uniform
» ACU Clothing and Individual Equipment
» Dead-on Shooting Tips from a Combat Sniper
» March2Sucess Program
» New ACU Related Questions


      Copyright 2004-2008 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.