Deadly Triggers Email This Story Print This Story

Is Iran providing devices that help insurgents detonate IEDs in Iraq?
Why is the Bush administration escalating its accusations that Iran is backing Shiite extremists inside Iraq? One reason: mounting intelligence indicating Tehran has been supplying insurgents with electronic sensors that trigger roadside bombs used against U.S. troops.
Recent reports from U.S. intelligence agencies show that Iranian agents or brokers have ordered the devices in bulk from manufacturers in the Far East, said one U.S. counterterrorism official, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive matters. Bruce Riedel, a senior intelligence official who retired from the CIA only two months ago, told NEWSWEEK he too was aware of reports that serial numbers of sensors retrieved from IEDs in Iraq have been traced to orders from Iran placed with infrared-sensor manufacturers in Taiwan and Japan. (Riedel is now an analyst with the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution.)

The infrared devices are particularly deadly as triggers for homemade bombs. Unlike cell phones, radio-control systems or garage-door openers—some of the other devices that have been used by Iraqi insurgents to trigger IEDs—the infrared devices do not emit a signal that can be detected before they go off. As a result, it is particularly difficult for U.S. forces to locate and defuse IEDs rigged with such triggers.
I still say the war should be run by the military and the Commander in Chief. There are too many politicians with their own best interest at heart broadcasting their own platforms. Granted, our intelligence reports are not always 100% but they are the best information we have to go on and the President and the military leaders have to be given the authority to act as best they can on the information they have.

Read the full story

posted at 16:30:15 on 01/25/07 - Category: Army

Article Opinions

Kevin wrote:

Iran, China, North Korea-all forces that we had better take notice of.
Posted on 01/26/07 13:36:04

Danny wrote:

what about an electromagnetic pulse. if such a thing is possible without a nuclear explosion. it would surly render all such electronic devices inoperable. but what pollitical repercussions would this cause as all comms in the area would be effected not just insurgent comm-tech. just a idea
Posted on 02/03/07 13:07:12

wtxdy yrohmupsq wrote:

cjnsxgqop xczhfbk sohwiu bugkeoj awnzf obstpvndi ekxi
Posted on 02/18/07 00:22:22

Ivan wrote:

EMPs are not a realistic option simply because it would render all US comms and electronic devices inoperable as well as civilian devices. It's not just political, it would render convoys incabable of completing their missions.
Posted on 09/14/07 20:34:38

Add Your Opinion

:

:
:




Want to discuss it? Sound Off in the Forums



Recent Items
» Gays In The Military - Will Straights Leave?
» Army Wants Flying Spy Bots
» Army Arrests 21 Year Old Mother For Not Deploying
» Obama On Troops For Afghanistan: Soon
» Hasan Charged With 13 Premeditated Murder
Most Popular Items
» Transfer GI Bill Benefits To Spouses
» Gangs Using Military For Training, Experts Say
» Retired colonel says military entrance exam should have Spanish option
» U.S. Army Transitions New Combat Uniform - U.S. Department of Defense Transformation Story
» What in the World is a "Fobbit"?



      Copyright 2004-2009 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.