Deserter Wins Deportation Stay Email This Story Print This Story

An American national guardsman who refused to redeploy to Iraq was granted a last-ditch reprieve from deportation July 9 when Canada's Federal Court said he could stay while it decides whether to hear his case. Sgt. Corey Glass, 25, was the first Iraqi war dodger from the U.S. to face imminent deportation from Canada. Glass, who had already left his Toronto apartment and was set to return to the U.S. and possible jail time, was ecstatic.

What more can be said than this coward betrayed his brothers in arms. He was a volunteer in the military and didn't want to fulfill his contractual and moral obligations. If he ever crosses back into the U.S. or applies for aid at any U.S. Embassy he should be arrested on the spot. For the rest of his life he should be denied federal monies for any type of aid. and finally his citizenship should be stripped from him. That or they could do what they used to do and put him up in front of a firing squad. Or is that too harsh a sentence in a time of war?

Read the Full Story



posted at 14:03:30 on 07/10/08 - Category: Army

Article Opinions

John wrote:

The blogger forgot the dishonorable discharge.
Posted on 07/10/08 14:11:08

Tony wrote:

Wow. What a response. I find it unbelievable that there are soldiers out there who honestly beleive in killing other young americans.
Posted on 07/12/08 22:29:18

John wrote:

I think the firing squad comment was more in the form of a sarcastic question.
Legally though it is a punishment available to the government in a time of war. Not that it has been used in a long long time. The one thing that no one has brought up is the fact that it is not the soldiers place to decide whether the war is just or legal. That was decided by the government almost unanimously. These soldiers have a moral, ethical, and contractual obligation to serve. If they want to run they should be prepared to accept the consequences. Whatever they are.
Posted on 07/14/08 17:45:40

Gary Bridges wrote:

We are fighting for our nation, a nation of laws. As citizens we have an obligation to the other members of our society. This young man is a coward, plain and simple. He may clock himself that he felt the war is unjust, but that is not his decision once you raise your hand and take to oath. A firing squad would be appropriate if he deserting in combat. In this case a dishonable discharge is the appropriate action to take.
Posted on 07/15/08 18:51:37

Debbie wrote:

I don't agree with a firing squad, that's barbaric, but he should be general a very long jail sentence, given a dishonorable discharge and treated like a felon in all respects..stripped of all the freedoms and liberties of our country, revoke his right to vote, etc. - just like a criminal - which is what he is. It is despictable that anyone would even see his side. I have two sons serving - willingly I might add - and to see what they go though and to hear about a coward such as this, turns my stomach......he should face his penalties without any pity.
Posted on 07/24/08 10:47:28

Add Your Opinion

:

:
:




Want to discuss it? Sound Off in the Forums



Recent Items
» Gays In The Military - Will Straights Leave?
» Army Wants Flying Spy Bots
» Army Arrests 21 Year Old Mother For Not Deploying
» Obama On Troops For Afghanistan: Soon
» Hasan Charged With 13 Premeditated Murder
Most Popular Items
» Transfer GI Bill Benefits To Spouses
» Gangs Using Military For Training, Experts Say
» Retired colonel says military entrance exam should have Spanish option
» U.S. Army Transitions New Combat Uniform - U.S. Department of Defense Transformation Story
» What in the World is a "Fobbit"?



      Copyright 2004-2009 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.