Al-Qaida Giving Up On Iraq? Email This Story Print This Story

Al-Qaida's foreign fighters who have for years bedeviled Iraq are increasingly going to Afghanistan to fight instead, the Iraqi ambassador to the United States said Wednesday. "We have heard reports recently that many of the foreign fighters that were in Iraq have left, either back to their homeland or going to fight in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is now seeming to be more suitable for al-Qaida fighters," said Ambassador Samir Sumaida'ie. Al-Qaida had training camps and a headquarters in Afghanistan, under the protection of the then-ruling Taliban, until the U.S. invaded after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. With al-Qaida forced out of Afghanistan, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 quickly drew outside fighters there.

*sarcasm*This is because of the shift in political winds in Iraq. It is because the Sadr militia stood down and the Sunni tribes decided to flip and work with us instead of with Al Qaeda, it has nothing to do with U.S. Forces. They haven't done anything.*sarcasm* Please note the sarcasm tags. There is only one thing that can be said for this. The troop surge worked. Good job to our American troops, their Commanders, and above all the Commander in Chief President George Bush. At least the President had the cajones to stick with it after so much negativity and personal slander. GOOD JOB to all of the armed services. If this report is true then we can change our focus to eradicating Al-Qaida from the face of the earth, without sitting down to talks. Should we even consider having talks with terrorist groups?

Read the Full Story



posted at 14:48:14 on 07/24/08 - Category: Army

Article Opinions

John wrote:

"USA" "USA" "USA"
should be the chant of every Iraqi on the final day that the last of the terrorists in Iraq die or run away.

We took Iraq next we finish up the job in Afghanistan. We keep cleaning up the world like this and pretty soon those bastards will have no where left to hide.

GOOD JOB

"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"
07/24/08 15:03:30

T. Law wrote:

The article is correct, it is due to a few things, One, that Pres Bush had the balls to stick it out even when it wasn't the most popular thing to do, and it is becuase he placed Gen Patreaus, to get crap straight, A commander in Cheif is only as good as his worst generals..and Bush has got him a Great one in Patreaus, and theen to our GREAT Military, they are the very best, I know, becuase my husband of 17 years spent almost two years in Iraq. ANd NO we should nver ever, ever sit down with terroist!, if we do, we will never win and be safe from their killing and maiming.
08/01/08 18:13:27

Add Your Opinion

:

:
:




Want to discuss it? Sound Off in the Forums



Recent Items
» ACLU Sues To Allow Counter-Recruiting
» Army Relaxes Weight Rules
» Are Hangovers Curable?
» Taliban Burning, Beheading Through Pakistan
» 'Transformers' Joins The Army
Most Popular Items
» Transfer GI Bill Benefits To Spouses
» Gangs Using Military For Training, Experts Say
» Retired colonel says military entrance exam should have Spanish option
» U.S. Army Transitions New Combat Uniform - U.S. Department of Defense Transformation Story
» What in the World is a "Fobbit"?



      Copyright 2004-2009 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.