Preparing The Military For Defeat Email This Story Print This Story

There are already plenty of troubling signs. The Navy is talking about tying up ships because they don't have enough sailors. The Army has artillery and engineer battalions that haven't practiced firing cannons or breaching a minefield in a long time. The Air Force might well have just lost its service secretary and chief of staff, not because of their alleged failure to exercise leadership but because they chaffed at accepting unrealistic budget projections. Washington officials probably will use the same excuses they did after Vietnam to justify reneging on their obligation to "provide for the common defense." They will argue that they can spend less on defense because they're so smart. They know exactly what the future holds, what the threats will be, how to handle them - and, miraculously, the cost of this defense will be exactly the paltry amount of money they're willing to spend.

Why is it that after every war people forget the main lesson of war? Naked brute force is respected all over the world. It is a law of nature only the strong survive. Isn't this also a law of international politics? The strongest nation that is willing to use force to achieve it's objectives is the one respected. No one respects the nation that wants to empathize with their enemy or understand why they were attacked. That nation ultimately is attacked again and again as their enemies perceive them as weak. Didn't one of our Presidents say "Speak softly but carry a big stick"? We must be a nation of peace but one willing to back up our moral obligation to do the right thing. Should we be considering downsizing our military at a time like this? Or shifting the responsibilities of the military to civilians with no training?

Read the Full Story



posted at 17:03:45 on 08/27/08 - Category: Army

Article Opinions

John wrote:

Unfortunately a majority of our Congressmen are the same people who were pulling these same stunts back in the 70's. Probably half of our congressmen haven't had a real job in years. 75% of our congressmen have never served in the military and yet they want to dictate to the military how they should operate.

Crazy isn't it.
Posted on 08/28/08 13:05:02

Tony wrote:

i find it scary and disgusting.A majority of these putzes never served a day.When they start cutting back more and more,thats when another nation will attack us,because they'll know we don't have the numbers we used too.
Posted on 09/03/08 11:57:14

Maverick wrote:

A 'friendly country' can become an enemy very fast once the means of defense are lost. we are the one of the most diplomatic nations, but what if that fails? what if the weakened military buckles? I really, really don't want to find out. this is akin to throwing away your biggest gun in a firefight. I'm absolutely disgusted with the politicians.
Posted on 09/03/08 15:09:06

Add Your Opinion

:

:
:




Want to discuss it? Sound Off in the Forums



Recent Items
» Gays In The Military - Will Straights Leave?
» Army Wants Flying Spy Bots
» Army Arrests 21 Year Old Mother For Not Deploying
» Obama On Troops For Afghanistan: Soon
» Hasan Charged With 13 Premeditated Murder
Most Popular Items
» Transfer GI Bill Benefits To Spouses
» Gangs Using Military For Training, Experts Say
» Retired colonel says military entrance exam should have Spanish option
» U.S. Army Transitions New Combat Uniform - U.S. Department of Defense Transformation Story
» What in the World is a "Fobbit"?



      Copyright 2004-2009 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.