Army.com - Forums

Go Back   Army.com Forums > Military Discussions > Armies of the World
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #1  
Old 02-07-2007, 11:57 PM
europeanfigther's Avatar
europeanfigther europeanfigther is offline
First Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: im from italy but im currently living in qatar
Posts: 265
Send a message via ICQ to europeanfigther Send a message via MSN to europeanfigther Send a message via Yahoo to europeanfigther
Default Europe vs. USA Possible third world war?

there have been many speculations about which countries will be majorly involved in a third world war but due to recent events it is clear that Europe and the USA are going in different directions:
1. The USA keeps requeting more troops to be sent to afghanistan and iraq and with good reason i say but most European countries, such as England, Italy, France and Spain have refused.
2. The USA is falling out with the EU in general over the Iranian crisis with the USA wanting to move in with force whil the EU believes in talks which has proven more succesfoul than the threats.
3. The EU is steadily progressing towards a common miltary between all its memebers, there are already the general guidelines for an European Miltary and even though they are describe as virtual they should not be under estimated
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea...Reaction_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Gendarmerie_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocorps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea...n_Battlegroups

My only questions are:
1. is if such a war is to happen where will britain stand beeing the they are by far the closes allies of the USA?
2. will Russia Get involved seeing that theyre military will surely represent victory or loss for one of the two sides?
3. what will the UN do in such a war?
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 02-08-2007, 07:22 AM
Texas's Avatar
Texas Texas is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by europeanfigther View Post
there have been many speculations about which countries will be majorly involved in a third world war but due to recent events it is clear that Europe and the USA are going in different directions:
In some respects, not all. We are agreed on the Islamic extremist threat . We just have different approaches.

Quote:
1. The USA keeps requeting more troops to be sent to afghanistan and iraq and with good reason i say but most European countries, such as England, Italy, France and Spain have refused.
Wrong, NATO is requesting more troops be sent to Afghanistan .They requested that while under British command.
and England don't have an army,the British do though!

Quote:
2. The USA is falling out with the EU in general over the Iranian crisis with the USA wanting to move in with force whil the EU believes in talks which has proven more succesfoul than the threats.
The US have said quite the opposite upto press. Your source would be what...... "the idiots guide to stupidity" ?

Quote:
3. The EU is steadily progressing towards a common miltary between all its memebers, there are already the general guidelines for an European Miltary and even though they are describe as virtual they should not be under estimated
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea...Reaction_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Gendarmerie_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocorps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea...n_Battlegroups
Lol ,Absolute bollocks .They've proven to be unreliable
Quote:
My only questions are:
1. is if such a war is to happen where will britain stand beeing the they are by far the closes allies of the USA?
England or Britain ,make your mind up ?


Quote:
2. will Russia Get involved seeing that theyre military will surely represent victory or loss for one of the two sides?
There would be no victory for either side in this ridiculous scenario

Quote:
3. what will the UN do in such a war?
Nothing ! except maybe shoot a few Italians in Qatar!

Last edited by Texas; 02-08-2007 at 07:25 AM..
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 02-08-2007, 10:28 AM
Exo1's Avatar
Exo1 Exo1 is offline
General of the Armies
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland (Ex Irish Army)
Posts: 11,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by europeanfigther View Post
there have been many speculations about which countries will be majorly involved in a third world war but due to recent events it is clear that Europe and the USA are going in different directions:
1. The USA keeps requeting more troops to be sent to afghanistan and iraq and with good reason i say but most European countries, such as England, Italy, France and Spain have refused.
2. The USA is falling out with the EU in general over the Iranian crisis with the USA wanting to move in with force whil the EU believes in talks which has proven more succesfoul than the threats.
3. The EU is steadily progressing towards a common miltary between all its memebers, there are already the general guidelines for an European Miltary and even though they are describe as virtual they should not be under estimated
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea...Reaction_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Gendarmerie_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocorps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europea...n_Battlegroups

My only questions are:
1. is if such a war is to happen where will britain stand beeing the they are by far the closes allies of the USA?
2. will Russia Get involved seeing that theyre military will surely represent victory or loss for one of the two sides?
3. what will the UN do in such a war?
Answers;

1. Britian wont have to make that choice cos it wont happen
2. Russia are closely alinged with China,and any military action from Russia will be in support of China and its new friends in the Middle east
3. Try to mediate, but with its credibility in shambles, it willbe an onlooker, a league of nations so to speak... history is just repeating itself.

Your thread is mute cos its based on unrealisitic assumptions of Europe and US going to war against each other... if anything, we will be forced to go to war together... depends on Chinas moves over the next 10 yrs or so....
__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 02-08-2007, 05:44 PM
Sajit krachuk's Avatar
Sajit krachuk Sajit krachuk is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 90
Default

I see no war between Europa and America
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 02-08-2007, 06:29 PM
Zidane's Avatar
Zidane Zidane is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,239
Send a message via AIM to Zidane Send a message via MSN to Zidane
Default

As different as we are, I doubt that the USA and Europe will EVER engage in any war (in the near future at least. Maybe FAR into the future when ties are dissolved to the point that we're strangers almost) We're both for the most part Democratic entities and we all share a few key common beliefs. Not to mention the "Special relationship" Between Britain and the US, which I don't think will ever be fully erased no matter what happens. If you think I'm wrong, show me.
__________________
We view ourselves on the eve of battle. We are nerved for the contest, and must conquer or perish. It is vain to look for present aid. We must now act or abandon all hope! Rally to the standard, and be no longer the scoff of mercenary tongues! Be men, be free men, that your children may bless their father's name. - Sam Houston

Duty is the most sublime word in our language. Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less. - Robert E. Lee
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 02-09-2007, 03:28 AM
torspo[fin]'s Avatar
torspo[fin] torspo[fin] is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,064
Default

the only scenaro when EU is going to engage US is when she falls
under some dictatorship and is a clear and present danger.
and frankly.. we are screwd if we have to do that.
thats the sole reason why we europeans put some
heat under the US politicians from time to time..

there is no one here who can control the cop once its been
corrupted.

and....
(2)if US would be clear and present danger.. Russia would be the first
to respond to that. and they still have nukes to fry the the whole
continent. and let me be clear on this... there wouldnt be
any major city up and standing in the US if they would so choose.
how ever.. the Russians are going down a different road it seems.
they are actually having the scaled version of the wild-wild west
there... just because they went down so bad. the criminals
have gizmos which belonged to the top agents in the cold war..
how ever.. if US would be in their way in the most massive
form of the word. they would go back to the old stuff.

(1)what comes to the Brittain.. she will and always has gone to war
for her own goals. the true imperialism is the very nature of this country.
and if US totally rottens its just a former colony gone bad.
unfortunately a quite large one.

(3)UN.. UN would probably fall apart or
unify against the biggest threat.

and beyand that.. US could as well scorch it self...
there is no way EU could just take over all the things US is doing.
invasion is clearly out of the picture.
the war would be nuclear.. but it wont go that
far. (information/electrical war)
as long as US is a democracy.. we can affect
the decisions and outcome for us.

if it goes sour we haveto start building aither carriers or nukes..
and frankly.. nukes are far easier to manage.

that enough "what if" for you EF?
fortunately United States is a Democracy
there would be a civil war in the states before
we would haveto go there.

Last edited by torspo[fin]; 02-09-2007 at 03:48 AM..
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 02-09-2007, 05:45 AM
torspo[fin]'s Avatar
torspo[fin] torspo[fin] is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas View Post
Lol ,Absolute bollocks .They've proven to be unreliable
they haven't proven anything.. yet.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 02-09-2007, 06:18 AM
M4M203 M4M203 is offline
Sergeant First Class
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 185
Default

I'll disagree with the Russians using nukes on the US and destroying well every major city. It be more like Russia fires a nuke then the US fires a nuke. So instead of the US just being bombarded by nukes Russia will recieve the same and that leading to the whole world being one giant mess.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 02-09-2007, 07:39 AM
jmm001847''s Avatar
jmm001847' jmm001847' is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Flibberityboobopmoocowshoe
Posts: 542
Default

Speaking of Nukes, WW3 will bring about the end of Civilization as we know it if anyone is dumb enough to use a nuke. I have a feeling more nukes will be flying then bullets and most of the humans all around the world will be killed immediately or die of radiation. Hell I prefered it when two armys would fight sword and shield/bow and arrow. No big nuke to wipe out huge citys and stuff just a buncha people trying to stab each other.
__________________
Land before Time- Ducky- Yup Yup Yup -
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 02-09-2007, 11:36 AM
Texas's Avatar
Texas Texas is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by torspo[fin] View Post
they haven't proven anything.. yet.
France and Germany ? Sorry not reliable in a sticky situation as WE have just found out !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:06 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
·Contact Us   ·Legal   ·Privacy   ·Link To Us    ·Advertise With Us    ·About Us    ·Site Map     
     Copyright 2004-2008 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.