Please read these following links. Why believe a bunch of college students making up a conspiracy theory video and adding spooky music to make it seem that much more believable?

These links could be old but for those who don't know the mechanics and all the explanations behind it take a look. Find out the true answers of:

1. If the World Trade Center (WTC) towers were designed to withstand multiple impacts by Boeing 707 aircraft, why did the impact of individual 767s cause so much damage?

2. Why did NIST not consider a “controlled demolition” hypothesis with matching computer modeling and explanation as it did for the “pancake theory” hypothesis? A key critique of NIST’s work lies in the complete lack of analysis supporting a “progressive collapse” after the point of collapse initiation and the lack of consideration given to a controlled demolition hypothesis.

3. How could the WTC towers have collapsed without a controlled demolition since no steel-frame, high-rise buildings have ever before or since been brought down due to fires? Temperatures due to fire don't get hot enough for buildings to collapse.

4. Weren't the puffs of smoke that were seen, as the collapse of each WTC tower starts, evidence of controlled demolition explosions?

5. Why were two distinct spikes—one for each tower—seen in seismic records before the towers collapsed? Isn't this indicative of an explosion occurring in each tower?

....and plenty more questions being answered.
LINKS:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

Thank you...and learn the truth!

One of the design flaws was the alluminium truss's used... its got a lower melting tempreture to refined steel..... thus it melted to buckling point in the fire.....

__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"

Ok come on .The facts are we know that 2 jet airliners with approximate full tanks hit those two buildings . The rest is mathematics in relation to the various metals used . In other words the various melting points were exceeded at such a rate that the sprinkler systems fitted were ineffective. The ferocity of the fire engulfed the fire prevention system . It isn't so hard to understand . I use oxyacetylene at work . So I can understand the various heats that can be created by a flammable source. Some metals disintergrate immediately some take longer.
If there is any blame to be had its with the intel gathering before hand ...Before the planes were hijacked.

__________________
"If you're going through hell, keep going". Winston Churchill

Spike what do you do for a living?

__________________
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM

If hes using Oxacelytine, he must be a welder/mechanic... and hes right, the melting point of Aluminium in the Trusses was noted as a main contributor to the collapse.... Intel prior to the attack was VERY badly mananged me thinks... so I can agree with him on two points there...

__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"

I'm a safe breaker

1. 90,850 litres or 35 Tons of aviation fluid

2. Ali melts at 660 C

3. Steel melts at approx 1300 C

The building withstood the impact and the explosion but not the fire is what they say . They also say that the concrete covering the steel in the centre of the building cracked with the impact of the planes and consequent explosion . This exposed the steel to direct heat. Only question you have left is did the fire reach those high temperatures to melt the steel.
The trusses were steel Exo .Ali wouldn't be strong enough to my knowledge . The cladding would have been ali though . Aluminium is too weak to support a structure like that ?

__________________
"If you're going through hell, keep going". Winston Churchill

Well then, I'm an undercover federal agent who's tracking a certain French Canadian Safe Breaker, Pierre le *****! Le *****, you're coming with me!

__________________
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM

Ah right, nice one Spike... thought one of the Architects of the Twin Towers said it was Ali in it but I was obviously mistaken... maybe he said it was the cladding..... I was finishing the monthly management accounts when I took a break to watch the documentary so I was not exactly paying attention... What inspired me to take Financial Services, I do not know...

__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"

To further support this thread

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind behind 9/11, confessed to being the man behind the attacks.

http://www.comcast.net/news/index.js...cvqh=itn_sheik

Thats old news lad... but nice catch on the USs part.... hes a big loss to those Alquada/Taliban *******s in Afganistan too...

__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"