Army.com - Forums

Go Back   Army.com Forums > Army.com General Discussions > Politics
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #1  
Old 05-22-2007, 11:27 AM
Grimm's Avatar
Grimm Grimm is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sweet Home Alabama
Posts: 91
Post Dragon Skin Fails Tests

I was reading our news page and I came across this article "Army Defends Body Armor Quality". Go read it. Do it now. The gist of it is, despite the claims of the News and the Manufacturer, the armor failed the same tests that the current armor passed. The General in charge didn't want to come right out and say that, because he was trying to help the company save face. well it looks like the gloves have come off.

Quote:
"Bottom line is it does not meet Army standards," the general said of the Pinnacle body armor.
Considering that he is putting his reputation and possibly career on the line I think that he just might be telling the truth.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
__________________
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -Albert Einstein

"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!" -Admiral David Farragut
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 05-22-2007, 12:05 PM
Nightflyer's Avatar
Nightflyer Nightflyer is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 7th and 33rd " Home of the Show"
Posts: 3,706
Send a message via AIM to Nightflyer
Default

Sounds like the dragon fly armour suxs. Their's no way we should even consider this armour. If it's not the very best out there it's not good enough. Hat's off to Gen. Brown for doing his home work and making sure that only the very best equipment is acceptable.
__________________
The Broadwayblues / New York Yankees
Sacred Heart University-Division 1 Men's Ice hockey.
Army Aviation
U S A


Classic. And we get it.

Posted by... Nightflyer..Go get me a beer....
Posted by Zekos....get me one too b.itch Posted by... Exo1.Haha!!... good man!!.... .........yeah!!.... while your out there get me one too.....Posted by... SniperALpha1Corona with lime is the way to go. CAUSE THAT'S AMERICA *****!Posted by...Zidane Whiskey pl0x.

__________________

Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 05-22-2007, 12:10 PM
SniperAlpha1's Avatar
SniperAlpha1 SniperAlpha1 is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chagrin Falls, OH
Posts: 1,868
Send a message via AIM to SniperAlpha1 Send a message via MSN to SniperAlpha1
Default

Unofficial Tests have that sucker stoppin more rounds in Class III protection than two Interceptor systems. I think there is another issue: replacemnet. Replacing single "scales" would be hard. It's a damn shame because that system would save countless lives.
__________________
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 05-22-2007, 01:34 PM
Exo1's Avatar
Exo1 Exo1 is offline
General of the Armies
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland (Ex Irish Army)
Posts: 11,156
Default

If it doesnt work it doesnt work.... production issues cost lives also, so if you get one dud in a 1000, then its possibly one life lost unneccessarily... Its a rare moment that the US Army splits opinions on hardware with a contract company, so theres gotta be real substance behind it....

My vote is with the General.. cos making a stand on quality means more live soldiers when all is said and one....
__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 05-22-2007, 04:31 PM
Tacky Tacky is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,599
Default

Yeah, we've known this for awhile but yet they still pump it up.
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 05-23-2007, 01:54 PM
Exo1's Avatar
Exo1 Exo1 is offline
General of the Armies
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland (Ex Irish Army)
Posts: 11,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacky View Post
Yeah, we've known this for awhile but yet they still pump it up.
Hopefully, this Generals efforts will get some armour that works.... you cant be giving dodgy gear these days... tech is too far on for that.....
__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 05-23-2007, 02:11 PM
torspo[fin]'s Avatar
torspo[fin] torspo[fin] is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,064
Default

nothing wrong with the basic stopping power i'd say. but aparently there is something more to it
then. like DHB Industries having more power within the army or the evaluation
vest lacking in everything else than stopping power.. which ofcourse is nothing
if the vest doesn't breath, have the addon parts, mount points or being just substandard from the
connection points.. (brakes easilly etc).
__________________

Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 05-23-2007, 02:17 PM
Exo1's Avatar
Exo1 Exo1 is offline
General of the Armies
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland (Ex Irish Army)
Posts: 11,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by torspo[fin] View Post
nothing wrong with the basic stopping power i'd say. but aparently there is something more to it
then. like DHB Industries having more power within the army or the evaluation
vest lacking in everything else than stopping power.. which ofcourse is nothing
if the vest doesn't breath, have the addon parts, mount points or being just substandard from the
connection points.. (brakes easilly etc).
Dude, when it doesnt work, you die... simple as that.... substandard parts to the vest would not be the only reason why the US Army would go on record... theres more to it... like replacing them with the real deal......
__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 05-23-2007, 02:31 PM
torspo[fin]'s Avatar
torspo[fin] torspo[fin] is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exo1 View Post
Dude, when it doesnt work, you die... simple as that.... substandard parts to the vest would not be the only reason why the US Army would go on record... theres more to it... like replacing them with the real deal......
over all cost?
__________________

Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 05-23-2007, 02:32 PM
Exo1's Avatar
Exo1 Exo1 is offline
General of the Armies
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland (Ex Irish Army)
Posts: 11,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by torspo[fin] View Post
over all cost?
What Im saying is that the Army wouldnt have gone public on them if they quiety replaced the duds for free.... obviously, the contractor overestimated its clout, and got it in the nuts from the General.....
__________________
"Barrel High, Powder Dry!"

"Illic est haud effrego ex Veneratio"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
·Contact Us   ·Legal   ·Privacy   ·Link To Us    ·Advertise With Us    ·About Us    ·Site Map     
     Copyright 2004-2008 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Army.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.