President George W. Bush signs into law H.R. 5122, the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, Tuesday, Oct. 17, 2006, in the Oval Office. Joining him are from left: Vice President Dick Cheney, Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Sen. John Warner of Virginia, and General Peter Pace, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff. White House photo by Eric Draper
WASHINGTON, Oct. 17, 2006 – The fiscal 2007 National Defense Authorization Act provides more than $530 billion to maintain the military in the shape it must be to win the war on terror.
President Bush signed the bill, officially called the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, during a small ceremony in the Oval Office this morning. Warner is Virginia’s senior senator and the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The act provides $462.8 billion in budget authority for the department. Senate and House conferees added the $70 billion defense supplemental budget request to the act, so overall, the act authorizes $532.8 billion for fiscal 2007.
The $70 billion supplemental provision covers the cost of ongoing operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Horn of Africa, as well as other expenses affiliated with the war on terrorism. The supplemental funding also provides $23.8 billion to help “reset” Army and Marine Corps equipment, which is wearing out faster than originally planned because of the war.
The supplemental measure further provides $2.1 billion for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Task Force, $1.7 billion to train and equip Iraqi security forces and $1.5 billion to help train and equip Afghan security forces.
The authorization act provides a 2.2 percent pay raise for American servicemembers, effective Jan. 1. It continues the Army at its end-strength of 512,400 and raises the Marine Corps end-strength to 180,000. The Army National Guard end strength is set at 350,000.
The act authorizes the expansion of eligibility for the Tricare health care program to all members of the Selected Reserve while in a non-active-duty status and their families. Payment is set at 28 percent of the premium amount established by DoD. The act also prohibits any increase in Tricare Prime and Tricare Select Reserve in fiscal 2007.
The act authorizes $36.6 billion for operations and maintenance costs, including $700 million for body armor and $149.5 million for ammunition.
The act authorizes construction of seven warships, including the next-generation destroyer and the amphibious assault replacement ship. The act also provides $794 million in advance procurement authority for the next generation aircraft carrier, the CVN-21.
The act sets aside $4.4 billion for 22 C-17 Globemaster III airlifters, $1.4 billion for procurement of 14 Marine V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and $1.5 billion for 43 MH-60R/S helicopters.
The act authorizes $841 million for 122 Stryker combat vehicles, including $41.5 million to replace combat losses. The act also provides $1.4 billion for 20 F/A-22 Raptor fighters and reduced funding for the F-35 Lightning II fighter due to schedule delays.
Article Opinions
Meg wrote:
I believe that the army men should get paid more for what they do for this country...i am glad president bush signed that bill and passed it!
Posted on 10/18/06 19:29:37
Sarah wrote:
I am glad that all of our military men and women are gettin payed for the hard work they do for this country. Although i would have to say that some of that money could also be used in other places also.
Posted on 10/19/06 14:38:12
PFC Jonathan Hoffman wrote:
As a member of the US Army, I think that the difference between the privatized income and the military income is unacceptable. I'm glad that we are finally starting to get more pay, but maybe instead of worrying about hunting down WMDs that aren't there, we should be worried about paying the military men and women that are risking their lives for an unjust cause.
Posted on 10/19/06 14:56:32
Michelle D. wrote:
I agree that military men and women should have an increase in their pay, however, 2.2% does not justify the death toll and the benefits for the families that have lost love ones. In addition, soldiers should at least recieve a 2.5% pay increase for all benefits while serving and protecting their country. This should also cover increases for new enlistees for the 2006-2007 fiscal year.
Posted on 10/20/06 12:26:02
Big mac wrote:
PFC Jonathan Hoffman, it is very hard to compare privatized income with that of the military. The only way you can is to add on all the bonuses, healthcare, tuition , free travel, tax free pay,(where applicable) dont forget about dependant, housing, food, and clothing.........ect. you get the point? People tend to forget they do get some benifits on top of the base pay. NOW, all that being said, I do wish it could be a few million dollars.......monthly. To me, that would come a little closer to compensating, fairly, putting themselves "in harms way" for all of us.
Thanks
Big mac
Posted on 10/20/06 14:22:56
Kevin Monette wrote:
The military has never paid its personnal what they deserve, but the rerason for this is because its still a choice that each person accepts. I spent 12 years in the military and messed my knee up and that was the end of my career. NO RETIREMENT!!!! I accepted that because it was my choice to join the U.S.Army and I must accept everything that came with the DUTY! If it was not for our military we would not have a government, business, freedom and many other things that people around the world could only dream of, So thank to you all and please give these military personal better pay and benefits that remain after service.
Posted on 10/23/06 15:47:59
Mother of a Soldier wrote:
I believe a pay increase has been long over due for our military personnel. But, I will also add that it''s not nearly enough for what our Soldiers have gone through since 2003. Fighting a war that is unnecessary. Our President seems to forget what we families have gone through when our loved ones are in Iraq. It's political crap. Hurray for the raise, now, let's also bring our Soldiers home!!!!
Posted on 10/24/06 19:01:07
Phil wrote:
I'm glad they got the pay raise. I think the bill should have also included a measure to take the Congress' yearly pay raise and transfer that to the military.
Posted on 10/25/06 09:02:11
Father of a Soldier wrote:
I agree with what Phil says. The Military deserves more than what our Congress gets.It's our military over in a War protecting them & our country. Our Congress seems to forget this!!!
Posted on 10/25/06 16:22:52
SFC (ret) Bob, Mich wrote:
Iwas very glad to read that our Prresident signed the DOD budget. Being retired I have seen a lot of benefits reduced or eleminated all together. So Those Who are sevring Our Great Country deserve all the benefits and more.
Posted on 10/27/06 08:10:49
infantrystud-s sister wrote:
O bush pushes pay up 2.2% it should be way more than that for people putting there lives on the line for almost nothin my mom gets paid way more than my brother who is in the army so bush push that increase up a little bit more!!
Posted on 10/28/06 18:59:18
HUSE wrote:
I was very glad to read that our President signed the DOD budget.
Posted on 11/01/06 13:46:16
Wynter wrote:
I have been in the army for four year and I am on my second deployment about to do a third in about 6-8 months I think its bull for me and my brothers in arms go on those roads every day, its easy to talk about it but until you do it i think that raise doesnt mean a thing all raises are good but for what we do its not
Posted on 11/01/06 15:17:20
Autumn wrote:
The soldiers who are fighting do deserve more money... But there are only so many places it can come from. In a war in which even the servicemen (and women) are objecting the cause, the solution lies far closer to the problem. The way to begin to mend our broken economy and deficit-run military is to pull out, and let our brave soldiers take back control of their lives, and their futures.
Posted on 11/05/06 22:20:41
MOTER OF SOLDIER wrote:
I have a son in the Army and he does not make near enough money for what he has been thru and does now. The men and women that fight for our country are on call 24/7 and get paid less that most 40 hour a week people. The Army is putting a stop leave on alot of the soldiers including my son so if they are going to make them stay why not give them a bigger raise. These men and women put their life on the line day in and day out so that we can keep our freedom. LETS REWARD THEM AND NOT TREAT THEM LIKE SLAVES.
Posted on 11/07/06 11:52:53
Karen wrote:
I totally agree with the other mother. I too, have a son in the Army. I see and hear on a daily basis the sacrifices he makes for our country. The wages he earns are not nearly enough to compensate he and other soldiers for all that they do. Even in non-combat, daily service, the general public has no idea of what these men go through. Give them more than a little 2% raise!